Archive for the ‘Church Planting’ Category

New Wine for New Wineskins (revisited)

Wednesday, April 6th, 2011 by Art
It is VERY hard to divorce from our heads all that we “know” about the church already from experiencing what we have grown up with, and to NOT read into the scriptures reinforcement for these (mis)understandings by twisting scripture, pulling single verses completely out of context, etc.
Tellingly, Titus was told to appoint elders in every city, not in every congregation or home where they met. Paul did the same when he revisited churches that he previously founded. A plurality of elders, then, serves the local church delineated by a locality. This statement raises many functional questions:
1. Does the local church really mean a geographically “local” church in an area (the only biblical usage I can find, never do I see multiple churches in one locality in scripture)? Or, does it mean a group of people who organize themselves together separately from all other Christians in the same locality (the common practice throughout Christendom)? Are such divisions in a geographical location the kind of thing Paul railed against in the immature, Corinthian church? Is it the kind of activity Paul called hereticks–those seeking to draw followers off to follow them separately.
2. If “local” church means a self-identified sub group of Christians who band together ACROSS localities (the common practice throughout Christendom) as a separate “church” apart from all other Christians in all of those local areas, then where in scripture do we see this pattern even once?
So then, hierarchies and authority structures become immediately necessary if we want to consider it now “one church” in that locality, but YET continue to maintain the current authoritarian, positional leadership in multiple congregations that we now have. Leaders would have to work through who is in charge of what, where, when. Most leaders would feel like someone was stepping on their turf; some would be interested in expanding their influence (let’s assume to do good). It would be likely the layered clergy/denomination varieties of organization (presbyterian, congregational, or episcopal) would emerge if leadership remains in the current model(s). There would be much pressure for “leaders” to be somewhere near the top, in charge of everyone else. And, who will still get paid, how much? Who decides?
In other words, rediscovering biblical patterns for the church also requires rediscovering biblical patterns for leaders; in fact, biblical patterns for all believers. The “new” wine for “new” wineskins, or it will burst.
This doesn’t begin to address the substantive issues and objections the “laity” would have with all this. They are comfortable separating the secular from the sacred and enjoy the freedom from substantial spiritual responsibilities to serve others, to function as ministers along with holding jobs. The design we are discussing presents huge impositions on both clergy and laity.
3. If rediscovering biblical patterns for the church finds that all those in a locality are considered the church in that locality (as we have in the epistles, Acts, and Revelation), then we are left to understand how that functions–and we have the scriptures to aid us in that, but very little experience or extant models to draw from.
I think one of the things complicating this is the difficulty we have in divorcing our thinking that leadership in the church is positional/hierarchical, organized generally the same as any leadership structure the world uses (but, of course, benignly dictatorial by a single leader or a group of leaders).
One important step in rethinking the local church from a fresh biblical perspective, is to go back to a biblical leadership model–one that eschews hierarchy, position, and authority, and embraces instead relational experience over time to provide trust and persuadability among one another. To consider a community of saints that foundationally begins with mutual submission and mutual ministry expectations among all the saints as normative.
NT leadership resides in Jesus Christ. His leadership is spread throughout the saints, so that leadership on the physical level doesn’t come from above or beneath, it comes from within. Elders (overseers, pastors, bishops) are those who, by their manner of life and by the experiences of the saints over time, have earned respect by their care and service. They are then in a position of public influence and persuasion, but not of positional power of an office like we have in the world.
Who is then “in charge?” The same person who was always (supposed to be) in charge — Jesus Christ, the Head of the church. But remember, a core foundation is that we all endeavor to be in responsive submission to Him who loved us and died for us, and therefore to each other and with recognition that God has engifted every saint to be of mutual service to each other. In that scenario, elders have substantive influence, but not control: not the power to decide on behalf of some laity subgroup, nor to serve in lieu of the saints functioning. So, elders will have much influence, and they should be wiser, more experienced in following Him in difficulties and in sacrifices. But no one becomes a child in the community–a “laity.” Consensus needs to be built, not commands issued.
In the end, unless the Lord dramatically turns the churches–the saints–upside down, the best we will achieve is some hybrid, where the worldly infused church models are accommodated in some way by those who are set free to follow Jesus and feel connected to all saints everywhere, but especially those in our locality, and especially those with whom we have frequent interaction and influence. It will take real trust in the Head of the church to begin to live out NT church principles in the midst of chaos and foolishness.
Impossible? Yes, without Him. We can still strive to hear, “Well done…”

It is VERY hard to divorce from our heads all that we “know” about the church already from experiencing what we have grown up with, and to NOT read into the scriptures reinforcement for these (mis)understandings by twisting scripture, pulling single verses completely out of context, etc.

Tellingly, Titus was told to appoint elders in every city, not in every congregation or home where they met. Paul did the same when he revisited churches that he previously founded. A plurality of elders, then, serves the local church delineated by a locality. This statement raises many functional questions:

1. Does the local church really mean a geographically “local” church in an area (the only biblical usage I can find, never do I see multiple churches in one locality in scripture)? Or, does it mean a group of people who organize themselves together separately from all other Christians in the same locality (the common practice throughout Christendom)? Are such divisions in a geographical location the kind of thing Paul railed against in the immature, Corinthian church? Is it the kind of activity Paul called hereticks–those seeking to draw followers off to follow them separately.

2. If “local” church means a self-identified sub group of Christians who band together ACROSS localities (the common practice throughout Christendom) as a separate “church” apart from all other Christians in all of those local areas, then where in scripture do we see this pattern even once?

Next, integrating existing hierarchies and authority structures becomes immediately necessary if we want to consider it now “one church” in that locality, but YET continue to maintain the current authoritarian, positional leadership in multiple congregations that we now have. Leaders would have to work through who is in charge of what, where, when. Most leaders would feel like someone was stepping on their turf; some would be interested in expanding their influence (let’s assume to do good). It would be likely the layered clergy/denomination varieties of organization (presbyterian, congregational, or episcopal) would emerge if leadership remains in the current model(s). There would be much pressure for “leaders” to be somewhere near the top, in charge of everyone else. And, who will still get paid, how much? Who decides?

In other words, rediscovering biblical patterns for the church also requires rediscovering biblical patterns for leaders; in fact, biblical patterns for all believers; and all gladly and trustingly under His active leadership. The requisite “new” wine for “new” wineskins, or all attempts to return to biblical models will burst.

This doesn’t begin to address the substantive issues and objections the “laity” would have with all this. They are comfortable separating the secular from the sacred and enjoy the freedom from substantial spiritual responsibilities to serve others, not imagining or expecting that they could function as ministers along with holding jobs (as should all). The design we are discussing presents huge impositions on both clergy and laity.

3. If rediscovering biblical patterns for the church finds that all those in a locality are considered the church in that locality (as we have in the epistles, Acts, and Revelation), then we are left to understand how that functions–and we have the scriptures to aid us in that, but very little experience or extant models to draw from.

One of the things complicating this is the difficulty we have in divorcing our thinking that leadership in the church is positional/hierarchical, organized generally the same as any leadership structure the world uses (but, of course, benignly dictatorial by a single leader or a group of leaders). “We all know” someone has to be in charge “at the top” to get things done. Right? Well, Jesus didn’t think so in Luke 22:25-27:

“25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.

26 But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.

27 For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? is not he that sitteth at meat? but I am among you as he that serveth.”

One important step in rethinking the local church from a fresh biblical perspective, is to go back to a biblical leadership model for the church–one that eschews hierarchy, position, and authority, and embraces instead relational experience over time to provide trust and persuadability among one another. To consider a community of saints that foundationally begins with mutual submission and mutual ministry expectations among all the saints as normative.

NT leadership resides in Jesus Christ. His leadership is spread throughout the saints, so that leadership on the physical level doesn’t come from above or beneath, it comes from within. Elders (overseers, pastors, bishops) are those who, by their manner of life and by the experiences of the saints over time, have earned respect by their care and service. They are then in a position of public influence and persuasion, but not of positional power of an office like we have in the world.

Who is then “in charge?” The same person who was always (supposed to be) in charge — Jesus Christ, the Head of the church. But remember, a core foundation is that we all endeavor to be in responsive submission to Him who loved us and died for us, and therefore to each other and with recognition that God has engifted every saint to be of mutual service to each other. In that scenario, elders have substantive influence, but not control: not the power to decide on behalf of some laity subgroup, nor to serve in lieu of the saints functioning. So, elders will have much influence, and they should be wiser, more experienced in observably following Him through difficulties and in sacrifices. But no one becomes a child in the community–a “laity.” Consensus needs to be built, not commands issued.

In the end, unless the Lord dramatically turns the churches–the saints–upside down, the best we will achieve is some hybrid, where the worldly infused church models are accommodated in some way by those who are set free to follow Jesus and feel connected to all saints everywhere, but especially those in our locality, and especially those with whom we have frequent interaction and influence. It will take real trust in the Head of the church to begin to live out NT church principles in the midst of chaos and foolishness.

Impossible? Yes, without Him. We can still strive to hear, “Well done…”

(NOTE: This post was a response to a question on my friend Alan Knox’s blog, “I think the key to this entry (besides the lack of distinction between “clergy” and “laity”) is this: “All Christians are called upon (and expected) to minister.” That would it take for churches and Christians today to move towards this way of life in Christ?” His question was prompted by a post from an entry in “Dave Black’s un-pseudo-blog-type-thing. (See entry #2 from Monday, April 4, 2011 at 11:54 a.m.)”

Current Activity Focus

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010 by Art

Little time to blog, but happily busy! Here is where my primary activity is currently focused.

Current focus of activity

Current focus of activity

Variations in Service Focus and Time Spent

Friday, September 24th, 2010 by Art

itinerants_elders_saints3

Getting Our Christian Business Cards – or NOT

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010 by Art

I’ll admit, this seems like making a fuss over nothing.

I’m used to having business cards in the world of work. It is a convenient way to exchange contact information, and it’s expected. Of course, you want good quality stock and a good looking layout/color scheme, etc. The card represents you. Maybe creating a “Christian business card” wouldn’t occur to some people, but to me, it seemed a natural tool one would use. Read the rest of this entry »

New Apartment – Interesting Facts

Saturday, June 12th, 2010 by Art

Well, so I started digging around for ideas and resources from others who are working to reach apartment communities. Rather stunned to learn that in cities:

  1. Just over half the people live in apartments vs homes (within city limits)
  2. 40% of those in homes are considered “churched”
  3. Only 5% of those in apartments are “churched”

Gave me chills. Kept looking, found the National Multi-Housing Council site. More good news for the Good News. Some tidbits from their site: Read the rest of this entry »

Now what?

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010 by Art

Well, this week and we should have the last of the new furniture delivered. Next week we house sit/dog babysit for my son for a week back in Cary. Then, we’re pretty much finally here.

Um, now what? Where do you do when the start gun finally goes off?

We have made some progress in getting to know people in the area, but now that we are here morning, noon and night, there is so much more time to give to loving people. Here are some of the things we are doing. Please feel free to offer advice or other ideas (please, really). Read the rest of this entry »

On Mobility (and the vision for CTF)

Monday, April 26th, 2010 by Art
In discussion with a friend, the question about mobility came up. I wanted to share some of that on the blog.
> 1. What does it mean to be mobile?> Mobility should be considered in regards to the work, and not the worker.> The work involves temporarily assisting churches being planted or temporarily assisting churches working through change/issues. The core of that work also includes developing elders locally and other itinerants in the process (deeply OJT disciple-making at heart–see II Tim 2:2). Being mobile means we can live with existing or developing elders and with other itinerants for a season, to provide both us and them intense, mutually discipling relationships. Being mobile means we can help more than one person and the church in more than one place often, and these in turn, others, to produce a multiplicative effect.> In regards to the temporary nature of the work, we are engaged in any one place only for a relatively brief time (ranging in the biblical accounts we have to consider, from 3 weeks on the short side, probably 3 to 6 months typically, and on the outside a year or two). see http://churchtaskforce.org/resources/pauls-methods for an outline of this in Paul’s life. By defining the mobility based on the work and not the worker, we focus on the purpose and nature (which are helping and developing temporarily), and not the fact that this often, but not necessarily, means a transient existence for the workers.> It may be that you will find yourself moving from city to city, country to country, to pursue temporarily helping plant or strengthen churches in parallel with mutually developing servanthood in others (disciple-making together). But, it may also be, that there are so many hurting churches in just the area or region where you live that in your lifetime you could stay within an hour or two of home to do your work.> In fact, back in 2000, that was the conceptualization I started working through with the idea of “Church Task Force.” If itinerants are normative (and I’m convinced they are), then God has called people to this work. And since most people today live in or near large cities (worldwide), then there are also concentrations of these itinerantly-gifted folks (apostles, prophets, evangelists) in these locations, and there are concentrations of STRUGGLING, CONFUSED churches in these areas. For example, there are 1,600 hundred evangelical churches within a two hour drive of Raleigh, NC. If there were several teams of itinerants here, and each team could help a church for an average of 4 months, each team could only help 3 churches a year. Say, five teams. 15 churches a year. Say, for the next 10 years. 150 churches could be helped/planted. That is less than 1% of the churches, at least 80% of which (we’re told over and over) have plateaued or are shrinking (and there are worse sorts of statistics, like very little life transformation in this present unhealthy church environment, very few new souls reached with the gospel, large segments of society completely ignorant of the gospel, and having little evidence of God based on those around them who say they know Him.> If we had 5 teams of itinerants in every major city in the world today, we could effectively reach and serve 1% of the churches in the world in the next ten years. Seems paltry. This is what faced our Lord, and what faced Paul, but they both chose to start with a small group to get an immensely big job done. Remember, each church reached becomes a bright light in the community for other churches to follow (see I Thess 1:7-10). The multiplicative effect of this–if you can imagine just some of the churches these folks helped or planted would grow and mature, would see the church restored and transforming lives and lifestyles, if sacrificial living and joyful sharing of hearts were to begin to infect communities and workplaces–well, we might see again what we saw in the NT, and once again the church might turn the world upside down, everywhere being spoken about, filling it with the news and evidence of Jesus the Lord.> That is, in fact, the vision behind Church Task Force. To see these teams emerge across major cities and yet reach into the smaller towns in the region. To help them understand their calling. Especially to understand the flexibility in differences for each church in the how, where and why as they fulfill the what and why (or, the the unchangeable principles and functions vs the flexible practices and forms). To help them understand how we fit with and yet become a contrast to the surrounding culture. To help them connect with each other and with struggling churches. So, in terms of mobility, defined by the work, you could fulfill your calling throughout your lifetime without ever moving your home once. You may well move out from your region, and travel more widely. Many will as He leads. But you MUST move where you are serving frequently to do the temporary work of itinerants in helping and developing.> Since today, the work of itinerants is misunderstood or not even considered an option for most of these people, they are stuck trying to fit their triangular little selves into square pegs. They either don’t fill those spaces well, or they don’t fit at all. They are distorted in many ways as their drive to serve tries to fit into what is available. They start “para church” organizations, they go into missionary work, they start churches and remain as “founding pastors” (by the way, a biblical oxymoron), they go to seminaries, they drop out of the church world, they rail against the church–in short, they do not fulfill their calling, and the church is crippled, losing a key component of its design.> One of the missing links has been a way to effectively provide the biblical foundation for those catching this vision–and Tim’s manual, “God’s Plan for Church Planting” very well fits that bill. We have a four day workshop to “turn the lights on” for those with this calling. We have the material online, but that needs to be condensed and used as an intro to whet the appaetite for the workshop. And, the workshop needs to whet the appetite for working together with others as itinerants in planting new churches and in helping struggling churches. To effectively train ourselves, we need to spend time together in the work, not just in transferring information.> After 25 years of study, pondering, fussing and frankly fuming at times, the idea of Church Task Force emerged in 2000. So, you can see, it has been 10 years in getting to this point, where a few people are talking together about these things, where the workshops are set to go, where the website is building content on the topic, and where those with itinerant callings are connecting. The site content is really a first draft of material for a book on the itinerants. I’m hoping several of you will be contributors to that material and book.> The current state of the church, I believe, is in part due to this lack. Itinerants are like the white blood cells of the Body, rushing to the scene of an infection, fighting it, and then dissipating. They help keep the Body healthy. They lay solid foundations for new churches, who themselves contribute to the example given to other churches in the areas of practical faith, sacrificial love and endurance-enabling hope (more on this when we discuss measuring effectiveness).> So, “Church Task Force.” What if we could find ways to connect with these folks? What if we could help them understand the nature of their calling, see the church differently (especially understanding principles vs the variety of practices to fulfill the principles) and begin to function the way itinerants function? What if we could begin to work together to temporarily assist churches and develop servant workers in and among the churches?> 2. How do you develop a self supported ministry that allows one to be mobile?> If you are thinking paid ministry, I don’t think this is what God is wanting from us. By your term, “self-supporting,” I’m assuming you are asking about how to support yourself as you work itinerantly.> I think each worker needs to be willing to live on a lot less than our society expects. The first steps to mobility are to lower debt and lower needed income. This is much easier when your children are raised or you are single. The next step is what work you do.>> If you reach into a region from your present base, this might be a less difficult question. But I still would not choose a career that laid heavy responsibility on me, such that I spent evenings, weekends, and mornings worrying about the business or institution where I work. I simply need some where I can earn enough money to support myself and others. If I were picking a career over again, I would think of nursing, or IT. In both of these, part time work will support you well.> We can live and serve on so much less than we imagine. Always rethink anything you do that takes money to function. Do you need a loudspeaker system and tents to have a picnic ministry, or just a lawn chair and a grill? Do you need to rent a building to hold meetings or lay out your living room differently? Don’t let finances drive your ministry needs, or it won’t be reproducible and it will hinder your reliance on the Spirit of God to bring results and to lead you.> yours,
1. What does it mean to be mobile?
Mobility should be considered in regards to the work, and not the worker.
The work involves temporarily assisting churches being planted or temporarily assisting churches working through change/issues. The core of that work also includes developing elders locally and other itinerants in the process (deeply OJT disciple-making at heart–see II Tim 2:2). Being mobile means we can live with existing or developing elders and with other itinerants for a season, to provide both us and them intense, mutually discipling relationships. Being mobile means we can help more than one person and the church in more than one place often, and these in turn, others, to produce a multiplicative effect.
In regards to the temporary nature of the work, we are engaged in any one place only for a relatively brief time (ranging in the biblical accounts we have to consider, from 3 weeks on the short side, probably 3 to 6 months typically, and on the outside a year or two). see http://churchtaskforce.org/resources/pauls-methods for an outline of this in Paul’s life. By defining the mobility based on the work and not the worker, we focus on the purpose and nature (which are helping and developing temporarily), and not the fact that this often, but not necessarily, means a transient existence for the workers.
It may be that you will find yourself moving from city to city, country to country, to pursue temporarily helping plant or strengthen churches in parallel with mutually developing servanthood in others (disciple-making together). But, it may also be, that there are so many hurting churches in just the area or region where you live that in your lifetime you could stay within an hour or two of home to do your work.
In fact, back in 2000, that was the conceptualization I started working through with the idea of “Church Task Force.” If itinerants are normative (and I’m convinced they are), then God has called people to this work. And since most people today live in or near large cities (worldwide), then there are also concentrations of these itinerantly-gifted folks (apostles, prophets, evangelists) in these locations, and there are concentrations of STRUGGLING, CONFUSED churches in these areas. For example, there are 1,600 hundred evangelical churches within a two hour drive of Raleigh, NC. If there were several teams of itinerants here, and each team could help a church for an average of 4 months, each team could only help 3 churches a year. Say, five teams. 15 churches a year. Say, for the next 10 years. 150 churches could be helped/planted. That is less than 1% of the churches, at least 80% of which (we’re told over and over) have plateaued or are shrinking (and there are worse sorts of statistics, like very little life transformation in this present unhealthy church environment, very few new souls reached with the gospel, large segments of society completely ignorant of the gospel, and having little evidence of God based on those around them who say they know Him.
If we had 5 teams of itinerants in every major city in the world today, we could effectively reach and serve 1% of the churches in the world in the next ten years. Seems paltry. This is what faced our Lord, and what faced Paul, but they both chose to start with a small group to get an immensely big job done. Remember, each church reached becomes a bright light in the community for other churches to follow (see I Thess 1:7-10). The multiplicative effect of this–if you can imagine just some of the churches these folks helped or planted would grow and mature, would see the church restored and transforming lives and lifestyles, if sacrificial living and joyful sharing of hearts were to begin to infect communities and workplaces–well, we might see again what we saw in the NT, and once again the church might turn the world upside down, everywhere being spoken about, filling it with the news and evidence of Jesus the Lord.
That is, in fact, the vision behind Church Task Force. To see these teams emerge across major cities and yet reach into the smaller towns in the region. To help them understand their calling. Especially to understand the flexibility in differences for each church in the how, where and why as they fulfill the what and why (or, the the unchangeable principles and functions vs the flexible practices and forms). To help them understand how we fit with and yet become a contrast to the surrounding culture. To help them connect with each other and with struggling churches. So, in terms of mobility, defined by the work, you could fulfill your calling throughout your lifetime without ever moving your home once. You may well move out from your region, and travel more widely. Many will as He leads. But you MUST move where you are serving frequently to do the temporary work of itinerants in helping and developing.
Since today, the work of itinerants is misunderstood or not even considered an option for most of these people, they are stuck trying to fit their triangular little selves into square pegs. They either don’t fill those spaces well, or they don’t fit at all. They are distorted in many ways as their drive to serve tries to fit into what is available. They start “para church” organizations, they go into missionary work, they start churches and remain as “founding pastors” (by the way, a biblical oxymoron), they go to seminaries, they drop out of the church world, they rail against the church–in short, they do not fulfill their calling, and the church is crippled, losing a key component of its design.
One of the missing links has been a way to effectively provide the biblical foundation for those catching this vision–and Tim’s manual, “God’s Plan for Church Planting” very well fits that bill. We have a four day workshop to “turn the lights on” for those with this calling. We have the material online, but that needs to be condensed and used as an intro to whet the appaetite for the workshop. And, the workshop needs to whet the appetite for working together with others as itinerants in planting new churches and in helping struggling churches. To effectively train ourselves, we need to spend time together in the work, not just in transferring information.
After 25 years of study, pondering, fussing and frankly fuming at times, the idea of Church Task Force emerged in 2000. So, you can see, it has been 10 years in getting to this point, where a few people are talking together about these things, where the workshops are set to go, where the website is building content on the topic, and where those with itinerant callings are connecting. The site content is really a first draft of material for a book on the itinerants. I’m hoping several of you will be contributors to that material and book.
The current state of the church, I believe, is in part due to this lack. Itinerants are like the white blood cells of the Body, rushing to the scene of an infection, fighting it, and then dissipating. They help keep the Body healthy. They lay solid foundations for new churches, who themselves contribute to the example given to other churches in the areas of practical faith, sacrificial love and endurance-enabling hope (more on this when we discuss measuring effectiveness).
So, “Church Task Force.” What if we could find ways to connect with these folks? What if we could help them understand the nature of their calling, see the church differently (especially understanding principles vs the variety of practices to fulfill the principles) and begin to function the way itinerants function? What if we could begin to work together to temporarily assist churches and develop servant workers in and among the churches?
2. How do you develop a self supported ministry that allows one to be mobile?
If you are thinking paid ministry, I don’t think this is what God is wanting from us. By your term, “self-supporting,” I’m assuming you are asking about how to support yourself as you work itinerantly.
I think each worker needs to be willing to live on a lot less than our society expects. The first steps to mobility are to lower debt and lower needed income. This is much easier when your children are raised or you are single. The next step is what work you do.
If you reach into a region from your present base, this might be a less difficult question. But I still would not choose a career that laid heavy responsibility on me, such that I spent evenings, weekends, and mornings worrying about the business or institution where I work. I simply need some where I can earn enough money to support myself and others. If I were picking a career over again, I would think of nursing, or IT. In both of these, part time work will support you well.
We can live and serve on so much less than we imagine. Always rethink anything you do that takes money to function. Do you need a loudspeaker system and tents to have a picnic ministry, or just a lawn chair and a grill? Do you need to rent a building to hold meetings or lay out your living room differently? Don’t let finances drive your ministry needs, or it won’t be reproducible and it will hinder your reliance on the Spirit of God to bring results and to lead you.

In discussion with some friends, the question about mobility came up. I wanted to share some of that on the blog.

1. What does it mean to be mobile?

Mobility should be considered in regards to the work, and not the worker.

The work involves temporarily assisting churches being planted or temporarily assisting troubled churches. The core of that work also includes developing elders locally and other itinerants in the process (the work is deeply OJT disciple-making at heart–see II Tim 2:2). Being mobile means we can live with existing or developing elders and with other itinerants for a season, to provide both us and them intense, mutually discipling relationships. Being mobile means we can help more than one person and the church in more than one place often, and these in turn, others, to produce a multiplicative effect.

In regards to the temporary nature of the work, we are engaged in any one place only for a relatively brief time (ranging in the biblical accounts we have to consider, from 3 weeks on the short side, probably 3 to 6 months typically, and on the outside a year or two). See Pauls methods for an outline of this in Paul’s life. By defining the mobility based on the work and not the worker, we focus on the purpose and nature (which are temporarily helping and developing), and not the fact that this often, but not necessarily, means a transient existence for the workers. Read the rest of this entry »

New Apartment

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010 by Art

I’m excited this morning. For the past couple of months Deb and I have been looking to move into one of the many large apartment complexes near work. We’ve walked the grounds, met some people, made some friends, and prayed. Several of the folks at work live in these communities. One of our goals is to find natural ways to connect with and care for unsaved people as we work to plant a church.

A few weeks ago, on our way to a picnic we were hosting for about 20 people (friends we’re getting to know in that side of town), we drove past some apartments we hadn’t seen. We’d already pretty much decided, with reasonable logic, on another complex. Just to be sure that we pursued any and every nudge by God, we checked this last one out before signing the lease elsewhere. Well, sure enough, as so often in following the God of the last minute (always on time, never late, and–frustratingly for type A’s–never early), our Logical choice gave way to a calm conviction of heart. We’ve signed a lease at The Trails. Now what? Read the rest of this entry »

Discipleship Scale with Missional Message Matrix

Friday, April 16th, 2010 by Art

What are you saying? (A discipleship scale with missional message matrix.)

Both the Engel Scale and the Gray Matrix helped us better think about evangelism from the perspective of the lost. They help us understand that the unsaved person comes to faith through an incremental series of steps in either knowledge or attitude. But how do we see ourselves contributing?

Read the rest of this entry »

Hospitality …and itinerants?

Thursday, March 18th, 2010 by Art
Often we equate hospitality with entertaining, making people feel comfortable, or feeding people generously; and most often this is in relation to relatives, friends and neighbors.  But reading scripture, we may find that hospitality has more to do with enabling an itinerant ministry to function and fulfill its work by being in close proximity with the lives of believers in general and leaders in particular, than with mere neighborliness.
1. Hospitality plays a key role in how believers meet together and enter into mutual ministry (“one-anothering”)
I Pet 4:7-10, “But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.  And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins.  Use hospitality one to another without grudging.  As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.  If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do it as of the ability which God giveth: that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.”
Rom 12:13, (all) “Distributing to the necessity of saints; given to hospitality.”
I Tim 3:2 (elders) “addicted to” hospitality
I Tim 5:10  (widows) “lodged strangers”
Titus 1:8 (elders) “lover of” strangers
Heb 13:2 (all) “don’t forget” to entertain strangers
II John v. 10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine (of Christ), receive him not into your house, neither bid him Godspeed…” conversely, if they do, receive them!
2. Hospitality plays a key role in the Ministry of Itinerants: Organizational and leadership development.
Titus 1:5 For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee:
I Cor 11:34 And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come.
Our Lord’s directions:
Luke 10:2, 7, “Therefore said he unto them, The harvest truly is great, but the labourers are few: pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he would send forth labourers into his harvest. . .   And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house.
Mk 6:7-12: “And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits; And commanded them that they should take nothing for their journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their purse: But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats. And he said unto them, In what place soever ye enter into an house, there abide till ye depart from that place. And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment, than for that city.
And they went out, and preached that men should repent.
Our Lord’s pattern Hospitality enables itinerant ministry
Luke 10:38-40, ” Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house.  And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus feet, and heard his word.  But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me.”
a chief Pharisee Lk 14:1” And it came to pass, as he went into the house of one of the chief Pharisees to eat bread on the sabbath day, that they watched him.”
Zacchaeus Lk 19:7 “And when they saw it, they all murmured, saying, That he was gone to be guest with a man that is a sinner.”
Emmaus Lk 24:49 “And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.
Hospitality Practices with Itinerants:
Acts 9:32, 38, 43 Peter at Lyda/Joppa, Simon the tanner
Acts 10:22,48 Peter to Caesarea, Cornelius the centurion
Acts 15:40,41; 16:4,5,14,15 Paul touring churches Thyatira, Lydia
Acts 21:8, 16,17 Paul traveling Caesarea to Jerusalem, Philip and Mnason
I Cor 16:14-18, “Let all your things be done with charity.  I beseech you, brethren, (ye know the house of Stephanas, that it is the firstfruits of Achaia, and that they have addicted themselves to the ministry of the saints,)  That ye submit yourselves unto such, and to every one that helpeth with us, and laboureth.
I am glad of the coming of Stephanas and Fortunatus and Achaicus: for that which was lacking on your part they have supplied.  For they have refreshed my spirit and yours: therefore acknowledge ye them that are such.”
Phil 2:19-30 Sending men to the Philippians: receive them…
Col 4:7-10 sending men: receive them…
Philemon 1:22 I may come: prepare a lodging…
Heb 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
III Jn 5-9, “Beloved, thou doest faithfully whatsoever thou doest to the brethren, and to strangers; Which have born witness of thy charity before the church: whom if thou bring forward on their journey after a godly sort, thou shalt do well: Because that for his names sake they went forth, taking nothing of the Gentiles.
We therefore ought to receive such, that we might be fellowhelpers to the truth.
I wrote unto the church: but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence among them, receiveth us not.”
(receiving tied to message AND messenger, not denomination and theology technicalities)
Church Warning:
II Jn 7-11, “For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.  Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.  Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.  If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:  For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

1. Hospitality is a means of facilitating ministry among the saints

Americans equate hospitality with entertaining, with making people feel comfortable, or with feeding people generously. Most often this way of being together is reserved for relatives, close friends, and even neighbors.  But as Christians read scripture, we discover that hospitality plays a key role in how believers meet together and enter into mutual ministry (“one-anothering”).

I Pet 4:7-10, “But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.” (note the sense of urgency and dependence)    ”And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins.” (”above all things” a critical key to functional hospitality and mutual ministry is love–love will endure the messy relationships of life together and embrace the joys of it)   “Use hospitality one to another without grudging.”  (hospitality presents a substantial burden on our time, energy, and resources–this isn’t a bar-b-cue once a month, this is a way of life that can wear you down if it is done as a duty and not out of love)   “As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.  If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do it as of the ability which God giveth:” (we don’t really need tests to discover our gifts–we only need hospitality that brings us together in the context of love, and gifts will naturally emerge) Read the rest of this entry »